Accident Funding

10 Seconds Can Change Everything. Case and Point: Michigan Football

Michigan should have had it in the bag. 10 seconds. They had possession of the football and a 2 point lead with 10 seconds left on the clock. Fourth and 2 at midfield. Victory was within their grasp after a hard fought out gridiron battle with Michigan State in one of country’s deepest college football rivalries. How could 10 seconds change anything?

Then it happened. Michigan’s punter fumbled the routine snap. In his attempt to recover the ball, the ball slung its way into Michigan State hands, and they made a frenzied rush to the Michigan end zone with time expiring on the clock. TOUCHDOWN!

104,000 shocked fans in maize and blue watched in horror as the minority of Michigan State fans went from accepting defeat to surprised euphoria.

Lives, too, are often changed in seconds. Accidents are unexpected and can be devastating. Some people need a lifeline after their world gets turned upside down. Legal funding can be that lifeline. Michigan fans can’t change the outcome of the game, but people should have choices when deciding how to move forward after an accident.

Oasis Financial

Families Avoiding Financial Distress After Injury Through Legal Funding

Hardworking Americans are living on the financial edge. With 76% of households living paycheck-to-paycheck, families are stretching even farther to reach the American Dream. This struggle isn’t limited to those who are truly impoverished. According to a recent Brookings Institution study, nearly two-thirds of households living “hand-to-mouth” are middle-class families that own homes and save for retirement. This means that a staggering 25 million working-class households are unprepared to weather unexpected events that could threaten to push them to the edge of financial ruin.

So what happens if life gets unpredictable? When you’re injured in an accident? When you have your ability to earn an income taken away? Insurance industry special interests have recently been on offense, criticizing legal funding—an industry that provides upfront cash to litigants in exchange for a portion of the potential settlement. Yet, Oasis Financial co-founder and CEO, Ralph Shayne rebuffed these critics Thursday saying that his company helps families “bridge the gap at a time of real need.”

He pointed out that insurance companies “have a profit motive to capitalize on people’s immediate financial needs and give them a quick offer that is cents on the dollar to the well-established fair value of the claim. The effect can be crippling to families that need that money to get back on their feet.”

Insurance industry talking heads often try to push their agenda by intentionally mischaracterizing legal funding as a “lawsuit loan.” In reality, financial professionals generally agree that it has the features of an asset sale, not a loan. Legal funding companies purchase a small portion of a consumer’s legal claim and do not get paid until the case is settled, which can take many months to a several years. Legal funding requires no monthly payments. And, if the case does not settle, the consumer keeps the money—all of it.

Legal funding causes no risk to a consumer’s credit. No risk of being sent to collections. And, no risk of being forced into bankruptcy. Shayne says that “these benefits can be a huge relief to families feeling the uncertainty and stress that comes with fighting for a fair settlement in the legal system.”

Credit cards and other types if financial products are certainly other options for many families trying to get by while waiting for a settlement. Yet, they come with their own risks. For example, if a person loses his or her case and has been living on credit cards, he or she will still have to pay that money back—plus interest—and can get trapped in a long, devastating cycle of debt.

“Choice is what families in distress need, and yet struggle to attain,” Shayne stated. “We give them a valuable option.” While legal funding is available in most states, new insurance industry-driven regulations have forced some companies like Oasis—one of the founding members of the Alliance for Responsible Consumer Legal Funding (ARC)—to limit access in places like Tennessee. This has eliminated options for families. Other state legislatures are considering such regulations, but they may hurt consumers more than they help.

Retha Arbogast of Evergreen Park, Illinois, was a passenger in a vehicle that was hit by a distracted driver. The accident caused a severe neck sprain, ruptured disks, and partially flattened her spinal cord. Arbogast’s injuries made it impossible for her to work at her job cleaning houses, and bills quickly piled up. With legal funding, Arbogast was able to keep herself afloat until she was able to work again. “I was able to pay my physical therapy bills and keep a roof over my head…If legal funding hadn’t been available to me, I can say with certainty that I would be homeless.”

Shayne says he hopes that future regulations are based on industry best practices, not “controls being pushed by the trillion-dollar insurance industry in an aggressive organized effort that has hurt working families.” Model legislation being forwarded by ARC would help standardize contracts to improve transparency for consumers.

“We strive for transparency and clarity in interactions with the families that come to us for help,” Shayne said. “We know they know that they are in tough situations, and we take our role in helping them very seriously.”

Funding

Sometimes the Little Guy Should Get to Win: Go Cubs!

Meet Malcolm. He was born exactly 12 years ago today, on the day that Cubs fans will forever know as the Bartman game. His dad, a dedicated Cubs fan, attended the game and then rushed to the hospital to be by his wife’s side. Malcolm has not grown tall over his 12 short years, but he has grown into a dedicated Cubs fan–with all of the pain that entails. He has suffered the agony of loving a team that has perfected the tradition of never being allowed to win. But last night, on the eve of his 12th birthday and 12th anniversary of the Bartman game, Malcolm got to be at Wrigley Field and learned that even when the deck has been stacked against you, you can win.

Little guys have been on the losing side of the battle with insurance companies for decades now. Insurers have perfected the game of targeting hard working, moderate income families and withholding the fair value of their claim after they’ve been in an accident. Insurers have millions of data points that help them figure out how to undercut families and lowball offers—offers families often take just to get by. For years, they have had no alternative options.

Legal funding has become a valuable choice for families when they suddenly lose income due to an accident. They can decide if selling part of that future potential recovery makes sense for them, rather than accepting a significantly discounted offer from an insurance company. And sometimes, just like Malcolm learned last night, the little guy will get to win – and families will get to recover fairly.

Written by Ralph Shayne, CEO of Oasis Financial and former hot dog vendor at Wrigley Field. 

Matthew Lehman

ARC Congratulates Indiana Representative Matthew Lehman

The Alliance for Responsible Consumer Legal Funding (ARC) @ARCLegalFunding would like to congratulate Indiana Representative Matthew Lehman on being elected House Majority Floor Leader of the Indiana House @INHouseGOP.

Leader Lehman has expressed in past testimony that legal funding has “been a lifesaver to many.”

We look forward to continuing to work with Leader Lehman in making sure this option stays available those who need it—both now and in the future—by implementing practical regulation that is not overly burdensome to the small businesses serving the citizens of Indiana.

US Chamber

ARC and the US Chamber Institute for Legal Reform agree on proper regulations for consumer legal funding

The other day the US Chamber of Commerce, Institute for Legal Reform released their paper titled “101 Ways to Improve State Legal Systems”. In the publication the Chamber weighed in on the issue of consumer legal funding or as they like to call it “lawsuit lending”.

After putting out some questionable information, they pointed to legislation that they liked and wanted to have replicated in the states. One bill in particular caught our eye, SB 1016 from Oklahoma that was passed and enacted in 2013. In the publication the U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform states: “Oklahoma S.B. 1016 (2013) (codified at Okla. Stat. tit. 14A, §§ 3-801 et seq.): Permits lawsuit lending only with respect to existing legal claims. Subjects agreements to the Uniform Consumer Credit Code. Mandates certain contract disclosure information. Requires consumer lawsuit lender to obtain a license and file a bond or irrevocable letter of credit. Prohibits lender from making decisions relating to the conduct, settlement, or resolution of the underlying legal claim.”

Guess what, WE AGREE. We agree that Oklahoma was a good bill and should be the bases for proper regulation in other states. It protects the consumers, it protects the legal system, and it allows the companies to operate in the state as a purchase of an asset and not a loan. This was further emphasized by the bill sponsor Senator Crain on the Senate Floor: “We are specifically defining the transaction is not a loan, it is a litigation financing agreement, so that we do not involve ourselves in any of the banking business. There is no cap.”

In fact in May of 2013 Harold Kim from ILR posted a blog on the signing of the bill, and in the blog he stated: “Governor Fallin, State Senator Brian Crain, and State Representative Leslie Osborn deserve credit for curbing lawsuit lending abuses in Oklahoma, and making their state a leader nationally on this front. Hopefully, other states will follow in Oklahoma’s footsteps.”

So can we now count on the support of the U. S. Chamber of Commerce, their members and the Institute for Legal Reform in passing legislation like what was passed in Oklahoma in the coming State Legislative sessions? We can only hope.

Alliance for Responsible Consumer Legal Funding Taps Former OK Lawmaker as Executive Director

The Alliance for Responsible Consumer Legal Funding (ARC) today announced former Oklahoma State Senator Rob Johnson as its new Executive Director. Johnson will oversee the day-to-day operations and strategic direction of ARC, a coalition that ensures the proper regulation of the consumer legal funding industry in the United States.

“Rob Johnson will be a strong advocate for the consumer legal funding industry and a leader for sensible regulations that protect consumer choice and promote free-market enterprise,” said Ralph Shayne, CEO of Oasis Legal Finance and a founding member of ARC. “Rob’s proven record of legislative leadership and looking out for the little guy in the face of big insurance interests will be an asset to ARC as it advocates for responsible regulation of the consumer legal funding industry.”

Before joining ARC, Johnson served 8 years in the Oklahoma State Legislature. As a member of the House of Representatives, he served as Majority Whip, where he played a key role in shaping a wide range of policy issues. As a State Senator, he authored some of the most comprehensive lawsuit reform measures in the country as well as a multitude of other pieces of legislation aimed at building a more pro-business environment in Oklahoma. Following his time in the Legislature, Johnson practiced law in Oklahoma City.

“Rob worked tirelessly as a lawmaker to ensure that hard-working Oklahomans could receive financial help when they need it most, and that fair access to the legal system does not depend on the depth of one’s wallet,” Shayne said. “Rob’s new position with ARC will allow him to continue and expand this commitment at the national level.”

“I look forward to working with ARC as it continues to advocate for the appropriate regulation of consumer legal funding” said Johnson. “Consumer legal funding provides a vital lifeline to many hardworking Americans whose lives have been disrupted by an injury and who have little emergency savings, and regulations will ensure that the industry can continue to serve as a bridge to fair recoveries for these consumers.”

About ARC

ARC represents a coalition of consumer legal funding providers, business leaders, academics, and other industry supporters who work together at the state and federal levels to ensure proper regulation of consumer legal funding. Consumer legal funding helps people meet their financial needs at the time when they most need it, shortly after their lives have been disrupted by loss of income and mounting medical bills. Consumer legal funding affords these people the option to sell a small portion of their legitimate legal claim for money now so that they can meet their personal obligations and pay for basic needs such as rent, mortgages, car repairs, utilities and groceries while they wait for a fair recovery.

###

Contact: Kip Eideberg

media@arclegalfunding.org

(202) 674-7901

Industry Reaction to Announcement that Tennessee’s Only Locally Based Consumer Legal Funding Company is Shutting Down Home-State Service Due to Harsh Regulations

Provident Litigation Finance, the only Tennessee-based provider of Consumer Legal Funding, announced today it is shutting down its services for Tennessee consumers as harsh state regulations take effect. Provident was started in 1999 by Nashville resident Dan Cleary, who personally ran the business ever since, serving more than 10,000 Tennesseans. Cleary was the largest provider of Consumer Legal Funding in Tennessee. He was forced to stop serving his Tennessee neighbors by the regulations of Public Chapter No. 819, which take effect July 1, 2015.

Consumer Legal Funding provides financial assistance to consumers who have suffered injury, economic loss and have a pending legal claim, typically an insurance claim from a car accident another driver caused. It is used to pay rent, mortgages, and other immediate family and household needs while the claim is processed by the insurance company, which often takes years.

The full ramifications of Public Chapter No. 819 went into effect today. The law, which was passed by the state legislature in 2014, mandates price restrictions that are below the break-even point for offering the service to the large number of people seeking it. “It is impossible for me to operate at the government-mandated rates” Cleary, President of Provident Litigation Funding, said.

A total of about three dozen Consumer Legal Funding companies, comprising the vast majority of the industry, have now pulled out of the Tennessee market. Most pulled out in the summer of 2014, shortly after the law was passed. Now that the law is taking effect, the one local business in the industry has also been forced out. Before Public Chapter No. 819, the industry had been serving an estimated 1,700 Tennesseans each year, providing consumers with an estimated $3 million per year to keep paying life-essential bills during tough times.

The fundings helped Tennesseans pay for rent, mortgages, electricity, car payments, health insurance, auto insurance and groceries. They meant $3 million per year was paid to Tennessee businesses instead of becoming uncollectable accounts or money that taxpayers would be asked to provide. Consumer Legal Funding empowered Tennessee consumers to meet their responsibilities and provide for themselves.

Public Chapter No. 819 was driven by the national trillion-dollar insurance industry and was actively advocated for by the Washington D.C based U.S. Chamber of Commerce. Executives from the insurance companies Allstate, State Farm and Travelers are on the U.S. Chamber of Commerce’s board of directors and were the driving force behind this legislation.

Eric Schuller, President of ARC states, “They lobby against businesses like Cleary’s because he helps empower people who are injured through no fault of their own to get fair settlements. Dan helped people keep paying their bills and meet their obligations during the long claims process.” Schuller added, “The funds that Dan and others in the industry provided in Tennessee gave consumers the ability to avoid foreclosures, evictions, car repossessions, and having their lights turned off. He helped them put food on the table during hard times.”

The Alliance for Responsible Consumer Legal Funding (ARC) represents a coalition of consumer legal funding companies, service providers, academics, and other industry supporters. It works at the state and federal levels to ensure the proper regulation of the legal funding industry in the United States. ARC aims to accomplish this mission by advocating at the state level for rules containing appropriate pricing and a high degree of consumer protection—including adequate licensing and disclosure requirements, and suitable limitations on fees—and at the federal level by working with policymakers to help ensure the alignment of federal and state regulatory efforts affecting the legal funding industry. For more information, visit www.ARCLegalFunding.org.

Insurance Watchdog Group “Hall of Shame”

As consumers become more aware of the barriers many insurance companies erect that prevent people from getting fair and timely claims settlements, many consumers are seeking information to help them pick insurance they can rely on. The watchdog group “Fight Bad-faith Insurance Companies” (FBIC) created a list of insurance companies that it determined follow “Bad-Faith” practices. The watchdog group also created a list of companies it says follow “Good-Faith” practices.

Click here for the FBIC rankings

Wreck Victim: Consumer Legal Funding Needs Protection from Alabama Legislature

Litigation Financing
By Tina Burns of Albertville, who used consumer legal funding after an accident
As published in The Birmingham News and on AL.com

Imagine having your life change forever in an instant by a distracted driver. Then to have the insurance company drag out your claim so you not are able to take care of your family. That is what happened to me.

If the insurance industry has its way, fellow Alabamians will be worse off than I was. I was able to get assistance through Consumer Legal Funding. But now a bill, HB 160, has reached the Alabama Senate that puts the profits of multi-billion dollar insurance companies ahead of the needs of the people of Alabama. The insurance companies are trying to take away Consumer Legal Funding, which helps people like me pay our bills and take care of our families when we’re injured.

Last December, my family’s Jeep was broadsided by a driver on a phone call. My son, daughter, husband and I were all badly hurt. Besides the pain of having my children injured, and of my own injuries, I faced tremendous financial struggles. I felt like my life was out of control.

Insurance companies take their sweet time processing a claim, even in clear-cut cases. The Jeep I had was totaled, so when I was well enough to go back to work, I had no way to get to my job. When I was finally able to get a replacement car, I was paying $120 a week on gas because our medical treatments were an hour away and required us traveling there three times a week. I eventually started going just once a week because it’s all I could afford. All of my expenses related to the accident are coming out of my pocket because we are still waiting on the insurance company to do what is right by us. When I fell behind on other bills, I got disconnection notices from the utilities. I did not know what to do.

I finally got some relief when I contacted a legal funding company and was able to get the money I needed to keep the power on and to put food on the table for my children. It was a huge relief to know there was someone out there who could help me.

If the Alabama Senate passes HB 160, the essential help Consumer Legal Funding provides will be taken away from ordinary people who need it. As soon as I heard about this bad bill, I reached out to the legal funding company that helped me and said I wanted to tell lawmakers my side of the story. That is how strongly I feel, and what led to me writing this.

I urge our Senators, and especially my Senator Clay Scofield, to do what’s right for people like me and my family. If legal funding was not there, who knows what would have happened to us.

Tina Burns lives in Albertville

HB160 helps insurers, not consumers

There is a bill making its way through Alabama Senate, HB 160, which will eliminate a vital financial tool for consumers of Alabama. The bill deals with Consumer Legal Funding.

Consumer Legal Funding is where a company provides financial assistance to consumers who have a pending legal claim and only is repaid when and if the consumer receives a settlement.

HB 160 is being promoted by the multi-trillion dollar insurance industry to eliminate this option from the residents of Alabama. By wiping out the industry, now consumers will be forced to settle for less than a fair and just settlement just because they are in financial need. There are provisions in the bill that would place unrealistic restrictions on the industry that no other financial product in the state has, thereby abolishing it as an option for those who need it.

What is interesting is that there has not been a single consumer complaint or issue in the state. In fact, consumers like Mary from Birmingham used the funds to stop her car from being repossessed while she was waiting for the insurance company to settle her claim.

So why is the Alabama Legislature rushing to put an industry out of business that provides a vital service to the citizens of the state?

The answer could not be more transparent, all roads lead back to Washington, D.C., and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and their crony capitalism. They want to ensure the multi-billion dollar profits of their members by eliminating a vital tool consumers have to stay afloat while their case drags on and on.

In fact in a recent study by the Corporation for Enterprise Development, it stated that the citizens of Alabama are among those with the highest percentage of financial insecurity in the country. So why are lawmakers willing to ensure their constituents are even more at a financial risk by eliminating this option for them?

We stand, as always, ready to work with the legislators to come to a compromise to ensure that this product is available to those who need it by proper regulation. But by placing restrictions on the industry that are outlined in HB 160, you are telling the citizens of Alabama that the bottom line is more important than having a roof over their head, like Renee from Huntsville who used the funds to stop an eviction.

No one plans to be in an accident, but when they are they should not be victimized over and over again by an insurance company that drags their feet ensuring you will take the first offer that comes along. If David from Hoover did not receive Consumer Legal Funding, then he would not have had the funds to pay for the surgery he needed while his case was being strung along.

We just ask the members of the Alabama Senate to keep the citizens of Alabama in mind when you cast your vote.

Eric Schuller is president of Alliance for Responsible Consumer Legal Funding (ARC). Contact him at www.arclegalfunding.org.